Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Más filtros










Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Clin Neurol Neurosurg ; 237: 108154, 2024 Feb.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38330803

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether adiponectin levels and the risk of trigeminal neuralgia (TN) were causally related, a two-sample Mendelian Randomization (MR) study design was used. METHODS: We obtained data regarding adiponectin from the UK Biobank genome wide association studies (GWAS) (n = 39,883) as the exposure and TN, using GWAS summary statistics generated from FinnGen, (total n = 195 847 159; case = 800, control = 195 047) as the outcome. We conducted a two-sample Mendelian randomization analysis employing inverse variance-weighted (IVW), MR-Egger regression, weighted median, and weighted mode analyses. RESULTS: We selected 14 single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) with genome-wide significance from the GWAS on adiponectin as instrumental variables. Based on the IVW method, a causal association between adiponectin levels and TN was evidenced (OR= 0.577, 95 %CI: 0.393-0.847). MR-Egger regression revealed that directional pleiotropy was unlikely to be biasing the result (intercept = -0.01; P = 0.663), but it showed no causal association between adiponectin and TN (OR=0.627, 95 %CI: 0.369-1.067). However, the weighted median (OR=0.569, 95 %CI: 0.353-0.917) and Weighted mode (OR= 0.586, 95 %CI: 0.376-0.916) approach yielded evidence of a causal association between adiponectin and TN. Cochran's Q-statistics and funnel plots indicated no evidence of heterogeneity or asymmetry, indicating no directional pleiotropy. CONCLUSION: The results of the MR analysis suggested that adiponectin may be causally associated with an increased TN risk.


Asunto(s)
Adiponectina , Neuralgia del Trigémino , Humanos , Adiponectina/genética , Estudio de Asociación del Genoma Completo , Análisis de la Aleatorización Mendeliana , Neuralgia del Trigémino/genética , Causalidad
2.
Clin Neurol Neurosurg ; 165: 1-6, 2018 02.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29253745

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: Supratentorial extraventricular ependymomas are relatively rare. Long-term outcomes and prognostic factor for this rare tumor have not been well established. The purpose of this study was to demonstrateprogression-freesurvival(PFS),overallsurvival(OS), and prognostic factors of such tumor. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Fifty-five patients with supratentorial extraventricular ependymomas from our hospital were included in this study. Epidemiological characteristics, clinical features, treatment,long-term outcomes, and prognostic factors for PFS and OS were reviewed retrospectively. RESULTS: The patients consisted of 30 males and 25 females with mean age of 30.0 ±â€¯23.6 years (range, 1-74 years). Twenty-nine tumors were located in the right hemisphere, and 26 in the left side. The 2 most common tumor locations were the frontal (n = 19; 35%) and parietal lobe (n = 11; 20%). All patients underwent surgical resection. Gross-total resection (GTR) was achieved in 42 cases (76%) and subtotal resection (STR) was performed in 13 patients (24%). According to the WHO classification system, 38 tumors (69%) were Grade III (anaplastic ependymoma), and 17 (31%) were Grade II (ependymoma). Three-,5-, and 10 year PFS rates were 60%, 49%, and 36%, respectively. Three-,5-, and 10 year OS rates were 79%, 64%, and 49%, respectively. EOR and tumor grade were identified as prognostic factors for PFS and OS on univariate analysis, multivariate analysis, and Kaplan-Meierlog-rank testing. Subtotal resection (STR) predicted a worse PFS (HR = 4.808; 95%, 1.942-11.905; P = .001) and OS (HR = 5.650; 95%, 2.114-15.152; P = .001). WHO Grade III tumors also had worse PFS (HR = 3.922; 95%, 1.429-18.182; P = .012) and OS (HR = 6.329; 95%, 1.328-30.303; P = 0.021). For patients with tumor recurrence, reoperation was significant prognostic factors for OS (HR = 2.091; 95%, 0.939-4.654; p = .000). Age, sex, tumor side, and postoperativeradiotherapy were not prognostic factors for PFS and OS. CONCLUSIONS: Most supratentorial extraventricular ependymomas are WHO grade III tumors. STRandWHO Grade III pathology predicted worse PFS and OS. Gross-total resection remains the optimal treatment for patients with supratentorial extraventricular ependymoma. Reoperation should be considered first in cases of recurrence. The role of postoperative radiotherapy as an adjuvant treatment for supratentorial extraventricular ependymoma needs further investigation.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias Encefálicas/cirugía , Ependimoma/cirugía , Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia/cirugía , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Neoplasias Encefálicas/diagnóstico , Niño , Preescolar , Ependimoma/diagnóstico , Femenino , Humanos , Lactante , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia/diagnóstico , Procedimientos Neuroquirúrgicos , Pronóstico , Estudios Retrospectivos , Neoplasias Supratentoriales/diagnóstico , Tiempo , Adulto Joven
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA
...